Greed is good?
In an
industry characterized by its excesses and lavish lifestyles, the world of
finance has taken on the role of a materialistic, savage-like society. Is greed
pervasive throughout high finance, maybe it is, maybe it isn’t, it’s neither my
concern nor my business to judge. My question is how far can greed get you?
Front row seats at a Lakers game, sure, a 4,000 square foot apartment in
midtown, sure, ringing the opening bell on the NYSE, maybe. From the bottom
looking up it is easy to be critical and or cynical toward such “luxuries,” but
I often wonder where they take you.
At the end of the day
trading is a game from my perspective. Most fail, some make it by, others make
it big. A game in which an individual is accountable to himself and potentially
clients, only as good as his last trip to the plate. A game where loyalty is
only measurable in relation to a benchmark for most players involved. If you
outpace a benchmark on a regular basis, the aforementioned “luxuries” become
second nature. Money continues to flow in, as others hope to piggyback off of
your mastery at the game. However, in the back of any trader, investor or speculators mind, they know it can all come to an end with one bad decision.
So what drives an individual to stay in a business of limited loyalty and failure always lurking by your side?
My question to those
who’ve “made it” is when and where does it end? Is the end characterized by
being in those court-side seats, or 4,000 square foot apartment, or is it
elsewhere? Is it bragging to others about your excesses to let them know you
are better at the game than they are? Is it having the power to be so influential,
an entire nation depends on your actions?
Or is the end
characterized by making a friend financially independent by protecting his/her
hard earned savings for 30 years? Having the freedom to explore one’s
individuality and other interests by being your own boss and setting your own
hours? By helping a parent avoid financial catastrophe, before the collapse of
a euphoric society? Being able to fund a child's enormously expensive higher education? Or is it being able to spend a weekday afternoon outside
with your child/spouse/parent etc., exploring and or sharing various interests in life and having the means to do so?
I guess it all
depends on where and how you derive value.
As a child I was
always taught to “follow my passion,” engage in activities and with others that interest
me. At some points it can be difficult to pursue a passion, at some points
maintaining contact with interesting people can be difficult. However, from my
experiences it seemed like a common lesson taught by parents and a commonplace
objective of most of my adolescent peers.
So I ask those that
demonize the “speculator,” the trader, the financier to look in their child’s
eyes to find the shallow, cold, ruthless greed and “passion” to be a figurehead of
materiality. May it be found in some aspiring traders, sure. However, I would like to think the second of
the two “ends” is also a possibility to consider before blanketing the
objectives of those in the profession.
I'd argue that many pursue a passion in finance, trading and or speculating for many of the same reasons so many other Americans go to work every day.